Standing in front of more than 100 students and asking them to do things instead of talking at them was exceptionally daunting. Then, I heard the buzz and excitement of discussion and knew I was on the right path.
HSCI 100 – Human Biology is a first-year service course that fulfills a breadth science (B-Sci) credit for students across the university. It is a large lecture course with student numbers ranging from 27 to 165 students. Typical class size is ~ 100 students. The students come from many different faculties and interests. Many are just out of high school or early in their university career.
This is the first course I have ever taught, and it started my teaching career in FHS. Since then, I have taught this course 15 times since 2010. I took on the standard lecture approach when I started to teach this course. I found students were not engaged, didn’t come to class (it was 8:30 in the morning), or would fall asleep. Teaching this course as a new instructor set me off on a path of experimentation with student engagement and evidence-based practice (Dolan & Collins, 2015). I still mostly use lectures in this class, but I break it up with discussion questions, polls, and the occasional case study.
Tutorials: This course has tutorials that are taught by TAs. Each week, TAs are provided with a detailed plan of what they should be doing in the tutorial sections. I have included an example.
I have implemented various experiments and innovations in teaching this course. Many of these were in collaboration with Mark Lechner, who also teaches this course regularly.
This has included:
Experimentation with classroom engagement technology, specifically iClicker, TopHat and Packback (2022).
Developing new assessments, including a critical thinking presentation based on the book Bad Science by Ben Goldacre and expanding the exam formats to include short answer questions in addition to multiple-choice.
Addition of in-class questions and activities such as the occasional case study.
Decolonizing the scientific method by incorporating Indigenous Science.
Mindset Transformation - In this course, I have challenged students' minds by considering unfamiliar worldviews and how they think about science.
Connecting to our Shared Humanity - I share my stories and ask students to share theirs as part of reflection assignments.
Student Experience and Emotional Growth - I have worked to create a non-judgemental classroom environment that makes students feel welcome and engaged.
Integration of Technology: I have used many different forms of technology in this class, including iClicker, TopHat, and Packback.
Importance of Reflection and Critical Thinking - This has come out in multiple ways. Reflection is part of the Indigenous Science component of the course. Critical thinking happens in multiple ways, for example, in the knowledge mobilization paper that looks at issues through both an Indigenous Science and Western Science lens and in the presentations from Ben Goldacres's book Bad Science (2008).
Systems Thinking - This is a strong theme of this course as we build up from basic atomic structure to a whole body. Reinforcing the body as a system is a critical concept.
Dolan EL, Collins JP. We must teach more effectively: here are four ways to get started. Molecular Biology of the Cell [Internet]. 2015 Jun 15;26(12):2151–5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e13-11-0675
Goldacre B. Bad science: quacks, hacks, and big pharma flacks [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bad_Science_(Goldacre_book)
This is a first-year course, and for many students, it is their first and sometimes only exposure to biology. I wanted to demystify science and make it more accessible for students.
I developed an assessment, Classroom Clinical Trial, in which students developed research questions and collected real-time data via iClickers. They analyzed the data, and it was submitted as a lab report.
Mark Lechner adopted this approach for his course sections and was interested in discovering if this project helped students identify as scientists. We co-applied for a TLDG grant to investigate this question. I have included an example of the assessment description for one of the years we ran this assessment.
I presented this work as a poster to the US-based Society for Advancement of Biology Education and our local Teaching and Learning Symposium. Though we wrote a manuscript, we have not submitted it.
More on this project can be found on the scholarship page
In 2018/2019, Mark Lechner and I worked with Lindsay Heller to integrate modules on Indigenous Science as part of a decolonizing teaching workshop and research grant. This work is challenging for many students, forcing them to question knowledge hierarchies and worldviews.
One component of this module is a classroom demonstration by Indigenous Plant Experts Cease and Senaqwila Wyss. Student appreciate this part of the course as it makes a lot of the theoretical information that we cover on Indigenous Science more real.
I have included a selection of end-of-course reflections from students to highlight their learning in the course concerning Indigenous Science.
Some of the examples show that some students developed a changed view. Others are still entrenched within their worldview or haven’t made huge shifts. Overall, I am including various responses to highlight how challenging it can be to incorporate this kind of perspective into an introductory STEM course, but also that it can be extremely rewarding.
More on this project can be found on the Decolonial Teaching page
I have included course experience surveys from three different years: 2016, 2019, and 2022. However, I did not include the feedback from the Fall 2020 course as I co-taught it with another instructor, and the students provided feedback on my co-instructor who taught the second half of the course. Due to the circumstances, the feedback surveys are a bit complicated since we moved back and forth between remote and in-person instruction. Additionally, I had to take a leave from teaching for a year, and it took some time to readjust to the post-COVID classroom.
The Indigenous Science component in the course is a bit polarizing, and some students do not think it has any place in a biology classroom. This seems to impact how they view me as an instructor. So, I need to strengthen the role and rationale of the Indigenous Science component to bring in a few more resistant folks. I also need to focus on post-COVID feedback since it's a whole new kind of classroom. I need to implement more flipped classroom approaches and generate more in-class engagement.
Sample Syllabus
Sample Tutorial Plan
Sample Midterm
Classroom Clinical Trial Instructions
Miskasowin Journal Sample
Sample - Lecture Slides
Sample - Lecture Slides
Course Experience Survey Fall 2016
Course Experience Survey Fall 2019
First time inclusion of Indigenous Science content
Course Experience Survey Fall 2022
Feedback on Indigenous Science Fall 2022